Showing posts with label exercise. Show all posts
Showing posts with label exercise. Show all posts

Saturday, July 30, 2016

Cholesterol - something to watch in childhood

Since our office has adopted new screening protocols based on the Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents, we have seen many questions and resistance. I suspect the resistance is due to the fact that kids hate needles and parents aren't sure if insurance will cover the cost of labs. Some families simply have a difficult time taking kids to a draw station.

These guidelines cover additional topics, such as blood pressure and tobacco exposure, but I will only discuss the most common questions specific to the cholesterol measurements here. A lipid panel includes the total cholesterol, triglyceride level, high density lipoproteins (HDL, "good" cholesterol), and low density lipoproteins (LDL, "bad" cholesterol). Some labs include other types of lipids.

My office website discusses the basics of cholesterol.

The dietary advice is summarized nicely in CHILD-1 Diet and Nutrition Recommendations -Childhood Nutrition Basics.



Preparing for the lab draw


If your child hates needles, I understand. But some things are important, and in pediatrics we focus on prevention. If we can prevent heart attacks, strokes, and other consequences of unknown risks of heart disease, we should.

Kids can be prepared before going to the lab. NEVER say it won't hurt. Everyone perceives pain differently, but if they know it might pinch or feel like a poke they will be prepared. Remind them it only pokes for a very short time usually and holding still helps it go faster. Tell them there will be a big rubber band called a tourniquet that will squeeze the top of their arm to help make it easier for the needle to find the right spot.

Let them watch this video on lab draws.  (Warning, this video does show a blood vial being filled... some people get queasy just seeing things like this.)

You can practice at home by letting them show you how they will hold still with their arm out. They can look away and take big breaths with a strong forceful blow out each time. You can wipe the arm with a cotton ball or tissue and talk about how that part tickles. Maybe they can pretend they're blowing out candles or they can blow on a pinwheel.

Make sure they are well hydrated with water before going to the lab. Remind the phlebotomist (who draws the blood) that studies show blowing out upon the insertion of the needle has been shown to decrease pain with injections, and I suspect also with lab draws. You can also use a video on your smartphone or tablet to distract during the draw.

What affects when you should take a child for the lab?


A child should be on his or her regular diet for 4-6 weeks before testing to reflect the child's true levels. If a child vacationed and ate fast food for a week but typically eats a healthier diet, the levels will be skewed toward the more recently eaten foods. If they often eat poorly, do not alter the diet for the purpose of the lab. Get a baseline that is accurate to their lifestyle.

Illness can also affect lipid levels, so ideally children will be overall healthy when the lab is drawn. If there was a recent significant illness, waiting 4-6 weeks to draw the lab is ideal. Significant illness would be one that requires hospitalization or surgery. If oral steroids were given, it would be best to wait at least 4 weeks. An upper respiratory infection, cough, or typical short term illness should simply be resolved before the draw. You would not need to wait 4-6 weeks for these common illnesses. If you are uncertain if an illness is significant, ask your doctor.

Fasting does not affect the total cholesterol significantly, but it does affect the triglycerides. It is recommended to fast 8-12 hours before having the triglycerides checked. This is most easily done by having children drink water in the morning without food or other drinks. Take them to the lab for the lab draw and then let them eat breakfast.

If it is not possible to take kids to the lab when they have fasted, be sure the lab knows that it is a non-fasting level. They will include this with the report so the doctor can evaluate the lab values with that important information. In general I do not enforce fasting if it is too inconvenient unless there is a history of a previous elevated triglyceride. If the triglyceride level has been high on a previous lab, it is important to do a fasting level to see if it is a real risk or due to a recent meal.


Why do we need to check cholesterol in children- isn't heart disease an adult problem?



We know that obesity increases the risk of having a high cholesterol and atherosclerosis.
Elevated triglyceride levels and obesity are associated with Type 2 diabetes. Children with obesity need routine monitoring of their cholesterol along with other chronic disease indicators.

Multiple studies show that parents often perceive their children to be a healthy weight, but in reality their diet and exercise are not healthy and their height and weight do not indicate health.
We know that a family history of people with high cholesterol or certain heart conditions increases the risk. Tobacco exposure increases the risk. Certain chronic diseases increase the risk of cardiac problems. All of these can be risks in otherwise healthy appearing children.

There are a significant number of children who have no known risk factors yet have an elevated lipid level. This can put them at risk for cardiovascular disease, but if it is known, steps can be done to lower that risk.

The simple answer is atherosclerosis (clogging of arteries) can begin in childhood, but has no symptoms at the early stages when treatment is most effective. There are some people who have a genetic predisposition to this despite healthy habits and an outward appearance of health.



Screening recommendations are done by age and risk.


Many things can alter the risk of cardiovascular disease, including genetics, recent illness, puberty, obesity, blood pressure and tobacco exposure. Guidelines take into account these factors to help determine when testing should be done. If risk factors are identified, a lipid panel should be done. All children, regardless of risks should be checked at 9-11 years and again at 17-21 years of age. If the levels are normal, a lipid panel should be repeated in 5 years. If abnormal or if risk factors change, the level will need to be repeated sooner, depending on risk.

From page 8 of the Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents Summary Report 

What are you going to do with the results?


Many parents are frustrated if we find an elevated level but then "don't do anything about it." We are doing something. We just don't start with medicines because medicines are not the best answer. We recommend a healthy diet and daily exercise. Those two things are more important than many parents realize. They can make changes that benefit your child for life. But they must be done. Making healthy changes for the entire family benefits everyone and makes it easier for a child to comply with recommendations.

Repeat levels will be required to see if the diet and exercise changes make an impact. If the results are consistently elevated or significantly elevated to require medication, a referral to a pediatric lipid specialist is indicated.

See page 53 of the guidelines


See page 54 of the guidelines

If you have questions about cholesterol screening for your child, please talk to your child's doctor. 


Other Resources:


Pediatric Lipid Disorders in Clinical Practice Workup, Henry J Rohrs, III, MD et al

Saturday, March 12, 2016

Staying healthy as an athlete

Many people assume that kids who are active in sports are automatically healthy, but that can be far from the truth. Sports do provide exercise, but not all kids participate at the same intensity level, some sports are more inherently challenging, many kids don't eat the needed foods to provide optimal nutrition, and many kids fall far short of the sleep they need to maintain healthy body and mind. There needs to be a balance: eat right, sleep adequately, and exercise daily. Kids also need time to be kids with unstructured time in addition to school, homework, and activities.

Not a typical team sport, but my kids don't do typical sports. This is from an office Bubble Soccer game. 

Eat right

First and foremost with nutrition, we all need to maintain hydration. Many kids avoid drinking at school so they don't have to use the restroom. This is of course not healthy. Talk to your kids about the importance of drinking throughout the day and troubleshoot toileting issues. When kids exercise, be sure they stay hydrated. The large majority of athletes need nothing more than water to stay hydrated. Water is by far the preferred drink of sports nutrition experts unless there is intense exercise longer than 60 - 90 minutes. This does not mean a child playing a baseball game for more than 60 minutes because they are not maintaining the level of intense exercise for the entire game. If a child is running a marathon, added electrolytes might be needed, but short of that type of intensity/duration, water is fine. Sports drinks add far too much sugar and unneeded salts to the diet. Encourage kids to take a sip or two of water every 15-20 minutes of exercise (more or less depending on how hot it is and the intensity of exercise).

As for foods, not all are equal and not all that are marketed as healthy really are healthy. Get in the habit of reading labels. The longer the ingredient list, the less healthy it probably is unless the ingredients are all foods themselves (such as a trail mix with a number of dried fruits and nuts). I've previously addressed the issues of kids getting too many calories. Far too many of our kids are overweight or obese. Many of them are active in sports, but they take in more calories than they use.

  • Carbohydrates give quick energy for activity. Examples of healthy carbs are bananas, berries, oats, pasta, rice, and whole grain breads. These are recommended before exercise for energy (but kids don't usually need to carb load unless they are doing an endurance sport), and after exercise with a protein. 
  • Protein is important for building and maintaining muscle. I like kids to eat foods with protein and to avoid protein shakes and powders, which are expensive and could possibly lead to too much protein. Examples of good protein sources include nuts and nut butters, eggs, lean meats and fish, yogurt (look for a brand without added sugar) and other dairy products. About 5 -15 g of protein (or about 0.5 to 0.8 grams of protein for every pound of body weight) is all that's needed after a workout, depending on age, size, and workout intensity. Many Americans get far more daily protein than is needed.
  • Fat is not as bad as many people make it out to be. It is an important energy source for our bodies and helps us absorb fat-soluble vitamins. Healthy fats come from nuts, avacados, meats, dairy products, and eggs. 

Sleep

Many athletes (and teens in general) fail to get sufficient sleep for good health. They are torn between the demands of school, sports, clubs, volunteering, and making the time for sleep. The spiral typically has them staying up late to catch up on homework, only to be more tired the following day, which leads to poor focus at school - then everything takes longer to do. This encourages them to stay up even later to finish homework, which reinforces the problem. It is not uncommon for me to hear teens report anywhere between 4 and 8 hours of sleep. None of this is enough. Kids who are chronically sleep deprived suffer from more injuries, falling grades, general irritability and depression. I see many teens who want me to find a reason for their fatigue with labs, but it commonly is simply due to sleep debt.

Try to get kids to get enough sleep so they are easy to wake in the morning, stay alert all day, and aren't irritable or hyper in the evenings. If they have trouble sleeping, talk with their doctor.

From the National Sleep Foundation

I see far too many kids who claim to be very active and eat healthy, yet they have problems keeping up with other kids running or have BMIs that seem too high for the reported habits (not due to muscle mass). This could be due to an underlying problem, such as asthma, or habits that aren't as healthy as you think. Bring your child in for a yearly physical to review eating, sleeping, and exercise habits in addition to other health related issues. With most insurance companies there is no co pay for well care, so make the most of your insurance dollars and schedule a well visit! If there are any concerns, you can work with your child's doctor to find help.




Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Heart Screenings for Athletes - Are they worth it?

In recent years I've been getting more and more reports of athletic heart screenings. The schools and sports clubs locally are offering for athletes to get a heart work up for a relatively small fee.



Why are they offering this? Because sudden cardiac death in athletes has been in the news a lot over the years, and we all want to minimize the risk that our child has an undiagnosed heart condition that may cause sudden death when exercising. We want to prevent sudden death by identifying those at risk and keeping them from the activities that increase risk. Communities and schools now are more likely to have defibrillators on hand in case of problems, but some children might benefit from an implantable defibrillator. (Side note: if you've not taken a CPR class in the past few years, a lot has changed, including teaching people how to use defibrillators. And you no longer follow "A B C" so it is very different. CPR is recommended for all teens and adults.)

Is the cost of a heart screen worth it?

A new report, Assessment of the 12-Lead ECG as a Screening Test for Detection of Cardiovascular Disease in Healthy General Populations of Young People (12–25 Years of Age): A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology, is a review of whether or not electrocardiograms (ECGs) are beneficial for all athletes prior to sport participation and is endorsed by the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society and American College of Sports Medicine.

There has been a lot of controversy over the years whether or not routine ECG screening of athletes is a a cost-effective means to find at risk young people. Northeastern Italy has done a comprehensive screening program of competitive athletes and has lowered their sudden cardiac death rate, which is evidence for the ECG screening. Despite this shown benefit, there are many problems with the feasibility of testing a broad range of athletes to evaluate for risk of sudden death (SD). Complex issues from the Statement linked above:
  1. the low prevalence of cardiovascular diseases responsible for SD in the young population
  2. the low risk of SD among those with these diseases
  3. the large sizes of the populations proposed for screening
  4. the imperfection of the 12-lead ECG as a diagnostic test in this venue 
It is generally agreed upon that screening to detect cardiovascular abnormalities in otherwise healthy young competitive athletes is justifiable in principle on ethical, legal, and medical grounds. Reliable exclusion of cardiovascular disease by such screening may provide reassurance to athletes and their families.

In short: To do an ECG screening on all athletes is not inheritantly unwarranted nor discouraged, but it isn't recommended either.

Although an ECG is not recommended, it is recommended to do a 14 point questionnaire for all athletes at their pre-participation sports exam. This is available below.

Positive findings on the history (questionnaire) or physical exam may require further testing, but using an ECG as the initial screen for underlying problems in the 12- to 25-year age group hasn’t been found to save lives.

Changes in the heart in growing teenagers can make it difficult to tell if an ECG is abnormal or a variation for age (unless read by a pediatric cardiologist, which is often not possible for these mass screenings).

False negative and positive results can lead to missed diagnoses (normal ECG but real underlying condition) or unneeded testing (abnormal ECG with a normal heart).

Mass ECG screening of athletes would be very expensive.
If your family can bear the cost and wants to do the screening, it should be done. But if the screen is abnormal, do not jump to the conclusion that your athlete will be banned from sports forever. A more complete exam by a pediatric cardiologist will sort that out.

Know that hearts can change over time, so one normal screen does not guarantee there will never be a cardiac event in your child.

If you do not feel that the screening is something you want to pay for or if you feel that it is not necessary for your child who has a negative 14 point screening, you should not be required to do so. The evidence does not support mass required screenings.

If however, your child has identified risks based on the questionnaire, a more thorough testing should be done.




These 14 points are listed in Table 1 of the above linked statement:

The 14-Element AHA Recommendations for Preparticipation Cardiovascular Screening of Competitive Athletes

Medical history* 
  Personal history
    1. Chest pain/discomfort/tightness/pressure related to exertion
    2. Unexplained syncope/near-syncope†
    3. Excessive and unexplained dyspnea/fatigue or palpitations, associated with exercise
    4. Prior recognition of a heart murmur
    5. Elevated systemic blood pressure
    6. Prior restriction from participation in sports
    7. Prior testing for the heart, ordered by a physician

 Family history
    8. Premature death (sudden and unexpected, or otherwise) before 50 y

of age attributable to heart disease in 1 relative
    9. Disability from heart disease in close relative <50 y of age

    10. Hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy, long-QT syndrome, or other ion channelopathies, Marfan syndrome, or clinically significant arrhythmias; specific knowledge of genetic cardiac conditions in family members

Physical examination
    11. Heart murmur‡
    12. Femoral pulses to exclude aortic coarctation 

    13. Physical stigmata of Marfan syndrome
    14. Brachial artery blood pressure (sitting position)§

AHA indicates American Heart Association.
*Parental verification is recommended for high school and middle school athletes.
†Judged not to be of neurocardiogenic (vasovagal) origin; of particular concern when occurring during or after physical exertion.
‡Refers to heart murmurs judged likely to be organic and unlikely to be innocent; auscultation should be performed with the patient in both the supine and standing positions (or with Valsalva maneuver), specifically to identify murmurs of dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.
§Preferably taken in both arms.
Modified with permission from Maron et al.3 Copyright © 2007, American Heart Association, Inc. 

Saturday, July 12, 2014

Learning and Behavior Series Part 4: Alternative Treatments for ADHD

This is the 4th article in a series of learning and behavioral problems. It will focus on non-prescription medicine treatments, natural treatments, psychological and occupational therapies, and complementary alternative therapy for the treatment of ADHD. This is a bigger topic than I initially thought, so there are many links that go more in depth with each subtopic.


Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

The first treatment for ADHD in children under 5 years should be cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with a licensed therapist. It also helps those of all ages learn techniques to control behaviors, screen thoughts before speaking, organize things, and more. Studies show that the best benefits for ADHD are a combination of medication and CBT for those over 5 years of age. CBT for younger kids involves a parenting style that is clear, consistent and has rewards and consequences. Working with a therapist involves parents more than the children. As kids get older, the therapist works with them to work on their own behavior.

Exercise and Going Green

Getting kids outside has many benefits for kids with ADHD. First, they are off all screens - which increase aggressiveness and impulsivity. Second, they are getting exercise. Studies show that when kids play outside their focus, attention, and behavior improve.

Exercise is beneficial to everyone on many levels, and in those with ADHD it is essential to help with overall focus and attention. Exercise helps to elevate the same neurotransmitters that are increased with stimulant medications, which helps with focus and attention and executive functioning skills (sequencing, working memory, prioritizing, inhibiting, and sustaining attention). Any exercise helps, but studies show the best are martial arts, ballet, ice skating, gymnastics, yoga, rock climbing, mountain biking, skateboarding, and whitewater paddling (I know not all of these are practical on a regular basis, but most are). These activities require sustaining attention, balance, timing, fine motor adjustments, sequencing, evaluating consequences, error correction, and inhibition.

Sleep

Sleep problems are common in many children, especially those with ADHD. Fixing the sleep cycle can have extreme benefits in learning and behavior. Sometimes it is as easy as getting a routine for sleep to ensure the proper number of hours for a child, but often they suffer from insomnia, nightmares, sleep apnea, restless leg, or other medical conditions that impair sleep time and/or quality. Symptoms of chronic sleep deprivation in kids are hyperactivity, poor focus, and irritability. There are many kids who can have all of their ADHD symptoms relieved when they simply get better sleep. I see this in many teens who suddenly "develop ADHD"- only it's really not ADHD at all. They are running on 4-5 hours of sleep a night. If your child has sleep troubles not improved with these Sleep Tips, talk to your child's doctor.

Occupational Therapy and Sensory Training

There are many kids with ADHD who benefit from using techniques that occupational therapists use with sensory processing disorder (SPD). In some kids, SPD might be the real diagnosis causing symptoms of ADHD, but in others they may co-exist. Treating SPD is usually fun for the kids, and there is no harm in doing their techniques even if a child doesn't have the disorder. Schools have started integrating these ideas into their classrooms as needed, such as having kids sit on stability balls or using tactile objects at their desks. Therapy for SPD involves playing in ways that use sensory input (such as with sand or play doh, rolling down a hill, manipulating tactile objects, and more). For a great list of ideas visit Sensory Integration Activities, but working with an occupational therapist is recommended.

Biofeedback and Neurofeedback

Biofeedback and neurofeedback are both approved therapies for ADHD. Children and adults with ADHD often have abnormal patterns of brain electrical activity on electroencephalographic (EEG) testing. EEG biofeedback is aimed at normalizing EEG activity by correcting the brain’s state of relative under-arousal and optimizing cognitive and behavioral functioning.

Neurofeedback trains kids to become more aware of their physiological responses and improve their executive functioning. Each neurofeedback session lasts 30-60 min and children usually need 10-20 sessions. Patients wear a cap that measures their brain activities, and it helps them train their brain to maintain focus during video games specific to this purpose.

The significance of most findings on neurofeedback and EEG biofeedback is limited by study design flaws that include small study sizes, heterogeneous populations, absence of a control group, inconsistent outcome measures, self-selection bias, and limited or no long-term follow-up. While this doesn't mean they don't work, I would like to see more studies showing their benefit.

Working memory training

Working memory training has been shown in studies to help with symptoms of ADHD, though there are some conflicting studies out there. Cogmed is the company that has studies showing benefit. It is a computer program that kids play like a video game, but it reportedly trains their brain to remember things. It is intensive: 1 hour a day, 5 days a week for 5 weeks, but can be done at home. It is expensive and not covered by insurance. About 70-80% of children show improvement immediately after the training, and of those who improved, 80% maintained the benefit over a 6 - 12 month window. Cogmed is designed to be used with medication, such as stimulants.

Herbs and other supplements

There are some studies (only 16 as of June 2011 -- 11 for nutritional supplements and 5 for herbal supplements, which in the research world is pretty small) supporting nutritional supplements or herbal medicines for ADHD, but many reported treatments have not been found effective. Pinus marinus (French maritime pine bark), and a Chinese herbal formula (Ningdong) showed some support. Zinc and iron both show benefit, but as discussed in Part 3 of this series, both can be dangerous at high doses. There was only mixed (mainly inconclusive) evidence for omega-3 and l-acetyl carnitine. Current data suggest that Ginkgo biloba (ginkgo) and Hypercium perforatum (St. John's wort) are ineffective in treating ADHD.

ADHD Coaching


Just like anyone who needs help improving a skill, such as a pitcher or golfer, working with a coach with experience helping others in that area, working with an ADHD coach can help many with certain aspects of their life. ADHD coaches can help with organization, motivate a person with ADHD to finish tasks, or help them learn techniques that makes them more effective at life skills. Coaches do not do psychotherapy or counseling, which is beneficial for people who are against therapy, but agree that coaches can help people improve skills. It does not work if the parent makes the child go. The child must be motivated to make changes in his or her life and be willing to work on things, then coaching can be great. Tips on finding an ADHD coach can be found on PsychCentral.

Nutrition

Nutrition is very important for learning and behavior in all kids. For more on components of nutrition, elimination diets, and supplements, see Part 3 of this series.

No strong evidence exists for the following: 

There are many alternative treatments out there that do not have scientific proof that they help. Many parents try these treatment programs in hope that their child's symptoms will go away. In general, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Don't be fooled into thinking "alternative" or "natural" treatments are without risk. There are always risks, including the lost time not being on a proven therapy, leading to a child falling further behind academically and suffering emotionally from symptoms related to ADHD.

Brain Balance has a center in our city, and I've seen more than a few parents who waste time and money on their program. I don't know of any that noted significant and continued benefit. Although their website might look like there's impressive evidence to use it, there really isn't. Please see Science Based Medicine: Brain Balance for more information.

Caffeine is a stimulant but since it is available from grocery stores instead of pharmacies some parents feel more comfortable using it instead of a medication. If you're using it as a drug, it is a drug. Whether it comes in a beverage or a pill, it is a chemical with properties that act like other drugs in our bodies. Unfortunately studies don't really support its use. It is difficult to dose since it comes in so many forms, and most people develop a tolerance for it, requiring more and more, which can increase side effects. For details, see Science Based Medicine: Caffeine for ADHD.

I have not been able to find any valid scientific studies for chiropractic medicine for the treatment of ADHD.

Other complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies that have been tried for ADHD but fail to show benefit include vision training and applied kinesiology. Insurance usually does not cover these and they can be quite expensive. I do not recommend them.

Remember...

There is no alternative medicine. There is only medicine that works and medicine that doesn't work. ~ Richard Dawkins
If it stays alternative, that must say something. Once an alternative treatment is shown to work, it becomes a preferred treatment, no longer an alternative...

Things to consider when choosing treatment plans: 

  • First, be sure your child is properly assessed to make the best diagnosis on which to base the treatment plan.
  • Natural isn't necessarily safe. Evaluate all the risks and benefits known before making a decision. Even exercise (which is always recommended) comes with risks, such as injury and at times sleep problems due to scheduled activity times.
  • Talk with your doctor about any treatments you are doing with your child-- including vitamins, supplements, herbs, brain training, therapies, etc.
  • Choosing one treatment doesn't mean you are married to it. If response doesn't prove to be beneficial, re-think your approach.
  • There is no cure for ADHD known at this time. If someone claims that they can cure your child, don't buy into it. 
  • Learn your costs. Does insurance cover it? Insurance companies often prefer certain treatments due to their cost and other factors. They also do not cover many treatments. Sometimes this is again due to cost, but other times it is because there is no evidence to show the treatment is effective. (Hint: This is a good clue to look at other treatments!)
  • Is the treatment something your child can do and is your family willing to put in the time? CBT is proven to help, but it doesn't work if the child and parents don't work on the techniques at home. Neurofeedback and Cogmed take many hours of treatment over weeks of time and are not guaranteed to work in all children.  Medications must be titrated to find the most effective dose that limits side effects. This requires frequent follow up with your doctor until the best dose is found.

Sources:

The ADDitude Guide to Alternative ADHD Treatment
WebMD: Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder: Alternative Treatments 
American Psychological Association: Easing ADHD Without Meds
Psych Central: Neurofeedback Therapy an Effective, Non-Drug Treatment for ADHD

Thursday, April 24, 2014

Screen time: Do you have a love - hate relationship with it?

Screen time. Parents often have a love - hate relationship with it. We've all heard the warnings that it is bad for our kids, but we've experienced the benefits of it keeping our kids occupied while we get things done. And some programs and games have an educational component -- do we group those in the same category as purely entertaining ones?



Most parents by now have heard the recommendations that kids under 2 years should have no screen time. At all. And older kids should have no more than 10 hours / week total.

Most parents are also fully aware that their kids exceed those guidelines. Some by a little. Others by a  lot. There are all kinds of reasons parents have for allowing this. Some are good reasons, others are not.

To be honest, there is still a lot we don't know about screen time. Research continues. When I was a child, television and movies were just passive watching. Thankfully there wasn't much offered, and with a limited number of channels, we usually stuck to watching tv only on Saturday mornings. Other times we played outside. Shows were not as action packed and overstimulating as those of today. Compare Mr. Rogers to pretty much any show designed for kids today with quick scene changes, music in the background and motion everywhere. Now there are interactive games, many of which are educational, or at least they seem to be teaching letters, counting, or other skills. There's even Wii and Kinect that use whole body movements to get kids off the couch. One can get a good workout with some of the games, but Wii bowling is nothing compared to real bowling.

So how do you count educational and active game time? Should it be included in that 10 hours/ week, or should you allow extra time for it? Are e-readers a form of screen? They often allow interaction like a computer and many can show videos and offer games.

Short answer about counting total screen time: We don't know.  Experts can give thoughtful opinions, but really at this point it's all educated guesses.

Some studies show that kids learn better when things are presented on a computer or video format. Maybe it keeps their attention better than a paper workbook. I love the ability to hold my finger on a word in an electronic e-reader and have the pronunciation and definition pop up. How many times as a young reader did I simply skip over words I didn't know? My daughter likes to increase the font size so only a sentence or two are on the screen. She feels like she reads faster because she "turns the page" more often. Does this build her confidence reading? Does it actually slow her down? I don't know. But she's happier to read and it seems to work for her. (This does drive me nuts if I pick up the Kindle after she's changed the settings... but I can change it back to my preferences easily.) Are kids losing the ability to find things in alphabetical order, such as using an encyclopedia to look something up, since they just hit "search" and find the answers? Does it matter?

Parents must really pay attention to what kids are watching and playing as well as how much time they are spending on a screen. For every minute they are on a screen they aren't interacting with people to work on social skills, they aren't outside playing games and getting exercise. If the games they are playing help develop thinking skills, strategy, math, reading, and more, then some screen time every day can benefit. If the content has violence or other age inappropriate material, it can be very detrimental. If they are online playing against other people, dangers multiply. While I can see kids who hate to read actually not notice how much they must read to play a game on a computer or tablet, are there better ways to get them pumped into reading a book?

There's a time and place for everything. The dinner table and bedroom are never a good place for online/screen time. Watch and play with your kids. They will love the time with you and you can better supervise what they're exposure is and modify it as needed.

More information:
Media Resolutions Every Family Should Make in 2014 has some tips to help monitor and limit screen time.
For information on internet safety, check out YourSphere for Parents.
American Academy of Pediatrics Media page.

Saturday, January 21, 2012

When To See Your PCP?

We have many kids who come in for what I consider "band aid" medicine. We only see them when they have a problem. They never come in when well so we can know more about them: what they enjoy doing, what good (and bad) habits they have, if they are growing properly... you get the idea.

I understand that it is time and money to visit the doctor's office, but it is time and money well spent.  Sometimes it isn't obvious that this is an investment that benefits in the long run, but preventative care has been shown to be worthwhile!  I typically feel that I give inferior care to kids I rarely see because I only see them when they are sick, and can only focus on the current problem, not the overall health. You can't use a band aid to fix a broken bone or high cholesterol.  Without proper evaluation, you don't even know you have some health problems.  Even our cars get better care: people do routine maintenance checks on their car every 3-5 thousand miles, they don't just call the service station when it won't start.

Many problems have few or no signs or symptoms until they become severe. Anemia, elevated lead levels, high blood pressure, growth problems, and behavior concerns are some that we typically only see when critical if kids don't come in for recommended visits or do recommended testing.  Some parents fail to bring kids to the lab or other facility for recommended evaluations. This can delay diagnosis and puts kids at risk.

There are kids who visit urgent cares often, yet never come in for routine care.  It may be years between visits with the primary care provider (PCP).  "PCP" is used broadly here, since the primary care isn't done.  I understand that sometimes it is because kids wake in the middle of the night and the parent wants a quick fix, parents don't want to take off work so go on weekends, or the drugstore with a clinic is on the way home, but this isn't good care on many levels.
I don't always trust an outsider's assessment of certain physical signs.  Studies show parents are much happier with a diagnosis of "ear infection" and a prescription than an accurate assessment of a viral respiratory infection and instructions on home remedies.  Many ear infections are over diagnosed, leading to inappropriate antibiotic use, despite better parental satisfaction.  It benefits a practitioner who will be evaluated with patient/parent surveys to provide a prescription rather than an accurate assessment and instructions.  It also takes less time to write a quick script than to discuss the diagnosis, when to follow up if worsening, what to do to help symptoms, etc. Less work and more satisfaction, sounds good, but...
I don't know if the provider has enough experience with infants/young children to recognize what is really going on. I'm sure some of the people working urgent cares are really good at what they do, but many have little experience when they start working without supervision. They have no one to ask for a second opinion, so even after years of working they haven't developed the same skills as a practitioner working with more experienced providers who are able to help when needed.  Bad habits can be reinforced because they simply have no way to learn better skills.
Quick treatment of some infections that really do need treatment leads to poor immune memory, increasing the reinfection rate.  Strep throat recurrences have been shown to happen more when kids start treatment with less than 2 days of symptoms. There is benefit to waiting!  Strep should be treated within a week to prevent complications, but allowing the body a couple days to fight it off first builds the immune system!  It is okay to wait until office hours for many (if not most) problems. 
Difficulty breathing, dehydration, altered mental status, many injuries, and other things do require emergent care. If your parent alert system is telling you your child needs to be seen, then an ER visit is appropriate.
Keeping a good timeline of infections helps the PCP know when it is time for more intervention, such as ear tubes or prevention medications. If quick fixes are always at another location, we might not recognize the frequency. Even when parents bring kids in with a history of frequent infections we can't make appropriate recommendations because we might not trust the diagnoses.  Parents might not ever be told that their child has asthma that needs a prevention medication, so they simply keep using the quick relief inhaler, which puts the child at risk for serious complications.  Asthmatics who have regularly scheduled asthma visits when they feel well have fewer wheezing episodes requiring emergent visits and admissions.  Improve management of frequent or chronic illnesses by visiting with the primary care provider for illnesses and when your child feels well to optimize medication use, make appropriate referrals, improve safety, and spend overall less time and money.
Recommended routine maintenance is spelled out clearly in a book that comes with every car, yet a maintenance book doesn't come with kids. Yearly exams for those over 3 years (more for infants and toddlers) are recommended at a minimum.  Routine care also means regular visits to check on chronic conditions, such as asthma or obesity.
Preventative Care Guidelines are developed by people smarter than me by reviewing statistics including risk/benefit ratios, cost analysis, and more.  These aren't perfect and are regularly reviewed and often change. Some recommendations are simply not followed because insurance companies don't cover the cost. Pediatricians and many others are fighting for better coverage.  Examples of things recommended at various visits (depending on age):

  • height/weight measurements
  • blood pressure screenings
  • lab screenings (anemia, lead, cholesterol)
  • vision and hearing screenings
  • development assessments
  • mental health screens
  • more...    


I'd like to think that I can make a difference with healthy lifestyles by providing regular routine care. Sleep habits, screen time, exercise, safety, and more are discussed at various well visits. This might uncover issues that need additional visits to be properly addressed, but early recognition helps improve outcomes.

I know my own kids take what others at the office (other doctors, the midlevels, even the nurses) say about safety, nutrition, and sleep more seriously than when I say it. (Never mind that I have qualifications to discuss and advise on this topic, I am just Mom to my kids!)  I also recognize that I see my kids daily, but don't know their growth parameters, blood pressure, heart sounds, etc from day to day living.  I bring my own children in for routine well care and follow up of health issues so that they can be the healthiest they can be.  It has become routine for me to schedule their summer physicals every Spring Break.  This routine helps because:

  • it gives plenty of time to find a time/date that fits our busy family calendar and the provider's schedule. 
  • it is a routine, which helps me remember... yes, I forget to make appointments just like everyone else! (Others use birth dates to remember, but I prefer summer visits for many reasons.)



It is not uncommon to uncover a problem during a well visit that needs to be addressed more completely but wasn't recognized ... even by smart, educated, attentive parents.  Please join me in healthy parenting and schedule routine checks for your kids!  Do the tests, treatments, and follow up recommended by your provider or speak up during your visit if you don't plan on doing them, which allows for open discussion about why they should or should not be done.

Use band aides when appropriate, but treat overall health with routine visits!

Monday, September 12, 2011

Kid's Weight is Weighing in my Mind

Reports of increasing obesity levels have been circulating for years on the news.  I see kids in my office regularly who are in the overweight or obese category and we all struggle how to treat this growing problem.  Excess weight in childhood is linked to many health issues such as high cholesterol, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and it can trigger earlier puberty- leading to overall shorter adult height.  Not to mention the psychological and social implications of bullying, depression, eating disorders, and more.

Why is weight so much more of a problem now than it was years ago? As a child I did not have a perfect diet, yet I was not overweight because we spent most waking moments outside if we weren't in school. My mother packed a dessert in every lunch box.  We ate red meat most days.  We usually had white bread and butter on the table at dinner.  We drank 2% milk and I ate ice cream every night.  But we walked to school-- without a parent by the time I was in 1st grade (gasp!)  There were only a couple tv channels, and Saturday morning was the only time we could watch tv.  We were able to ride bikes, go to a wooded area, play on a nearby playground, dig in the dirt, you name it - we found something to make it fun!  Today's kids are shut up in the house after school watching one of many tv channels or playing video games. Even those who are shuttled to activities get overall less exercise because it is structured differently.  They ride in the car to practice or class, then sit and wait for things to start. They might sit or stand while others are getting instruction. Simply put: they don't get to do things at their own pace with their own creativity for as long as they want.

What to do???  On one hand kids need to learn to make healthy choices to maintain a healthy body weight for height, but on the other hand you don't want to focus so much on weight that they develop eating disorders.  I think this is possible if we focus on the word healthy, not weight.   Starting at school age I ask kids at every well visit if they think they are too heavy, too skinny, too short, or too tall.  If they have a concern, I follow up with something along the line of, "How would you change that?" I am often surprised by the answers, but I can use this very important information to guide how I approach their weight, height, and BMI.  We talk about where they are on the graph, and healthy ways to either stay in a good place or how to get to a better BMI.  I focus on 3 things we all need to be healthy (not healthy weight, but healthy):
  1. Healthy eating
  2. Exercise (with proper safety equipment- but that's another topic!)
  3. Sleep (again, another topic entirely!)
Food is a part of our daily needs, but much more than that. It is a huge part of our lifestyle. We have special meals for celebrations but on a day to day basis it tends to be more repetitive. We all get into ruts of what our kids will eat, so that is what we prepare. The typical kid likes pizza, nuggets, fries, PB&J, burgers, mac and cheese, and a few other select meals.  If we are lucky our kids like one or two vegetables and some fruits.  We might even be able to sneak a whole grain bread in the mix.  If our family is busy we eat on the run-- often prepared foods that are low in nutrition, high in fat and calories, and things our kids think taste good (ie things we won't hear whining about).  We want our kids to be happy, and we don't want to hear they are hungry 30 minutes after the meal is over because they didn't like what was served and chose not to eat, so we tend to cave in and give them what they want.  We as parents need to learn to stop trying to make our kids happy for the moment, but healthy for a life time.

There is often a discrepancy between the child's BMI (body mass index) and the parent's perception of healthy.  The perception of calorie needs and actual calorie needs can be very mismatched.  I have seen a number of parents who worry that their toddler or child won't eat, so they encourage eating in a variety of ways:
  • turn on the tv and feed the child while the child is distracted
  • reward eating with dessert
  • refuse to let the child leave the table until the plate is empty
  • allow excessive milk "since at least it's healthy"
  • allow snacking throughout the day
  • legitimize that a "healthy" snack of goldfish is better than cookies
Any of these are problematic on several levels.  Kids don't learn to respond to their own hunger cues if they are forced to eat.  If offered a choice between a favorite low-nutrition/high fat food and a healthy meal that includes a vegetable, lean protein, whole grain, and low fat milk, which do you think any self-respecting kid would choose?  If they are only offered the healthy meal or no food at all, most kids will eventually eat because they are hungry. No kid will starve to death after 1-2 days of not eating.  They can, however, over time slowly kill themselves with unhealthy habits.  

So what does your child need to eat? Think of the calories used in your child's life and how many they really need.  Calorie needs are based on age, weight, activity level, growing patterns, and more.  

One of my personal pet peeves is the practice of giving treats during and after athletic games. It is not uncommon for kids to get a treat at half time and after every game. Most teams have a schedule of which parent will bring treats for after the game.  Do parents realize how damaging this can be?  
  • A 50 pound child playing 15 minutes of basketball burns 39 calories.  Think about how many minutes your child actually plays in a game. Most do not play a full hour, which would burn 158 calories in that 50 pound child.
  • A 50 pound child burns 23 calories playing 15 minutes of t-ball, softball, or baseball.  They burn 90 calories in an hour.
  • A non-competitive 50 pound soccer player burns 34 calories in 15 min/135 per hour. A competitive player burns 51 calories in 15 min/ 203 in an hour.
  • Find your own child's calories burned (must be at least 50 pounds) at CalorieLab.
Now consider those famous treats at games.  Many teams have a half time snack AND an after game treat.  Calories found on brand company websites or NutritionData:
  • Typical flavored drinks or juice range 50-90 calories per 6 ounce serving. 
  • Potato chips (1 ounce) 158 calories (A common bag size is 2 oz... which is 316 calories and has 1/3 of the child's DAILY recommended fat intake!)
  • Fruit roll up (28g) 104 calories
  • 1 medium chocolate chip cookie: 48 calories
  • Orange slices (1 cup): 85 calories
  • Grapes (1 cup): 62 calories
  • Apple slices (1 cup): 65 calories
So...Let's say the kids get orange slices (a lot of calories but also good vitamin C, low in fat, and high in fiber) at half time, then a fruit drink and cookie after the game. That totals about 200 calories.  The typical 50 pound soccer player burned 135 calories in a one hour game. They took in more calories than they used.  And I chose the cookie, which has fewer calories than other options (we're not talking nutrition here) and only let them have one...
What's wrong with WATER?  And eating real food after the game.  As a family. Around the table.  That snack is likely to decrease appetite for the next meal, and it isn't needed.  And if they're hungry, they're more likely to eat the healthy foods on their plate.

There are many resources on the web to learn about healthy foods for both kids and parents. Rethink the way you look at how your family eats.


Simple suggestions:

  • Offer a fruit and vegetable at every meal. Fill the plate with various colors!
  • Picky kids? Hide the vegetable in sauces, offer dips of yogurt or cheese, let kids eat in fun new ways - like with a toothpick. Don't forget to lead by example and eat your veggies!
  • Buy whole grains. 
  • Choose lean proteins.
  • Eat together as a family as often as possible.
  • Turn off the tv during meals.
  • Encourage the "taste a bite without a fight" rule for kids over 3 years. But don't force more than one bite.
  • Don't buy foods and drinks with a lot of empty calories. Save them for special treats. If they aren't in the home, they can't be eaten!
  • Drink water instead of juice, flavored drinks, or sodas.
  • Choose low fat milk (1% or skim) after 4 years of age. (Whole milk from 1-2 years is okay for the normal weight toddler. 2% milk is okay for the normal weight 2-4 year old.  It is now acceptable for most kids to take in lesser milk fat than previously recommended.) 
  • Limit portions on the plate to fist sized. Keep the serving platters off the table.
  • Don't skip meals!
  • Eat small healthy snacks between meals. Think of fruit, vegetable slices, cheese, and nuts for snacks.
  • Don't forget to move every day and get enough sleep!